The Impact of Knowing and Being Known

I frequently mention the importance of “knowing” in my training and consulting.  Communication increases when people are known to each other.  When a middle school science teacher can’t tell me the name of someone teaching freshman science at the high school, I know that communication about curriculum alignment or student needs is not going to occur.

Trust can be built when staff are known to each other. When teachers have not seen their colleagues work with students and not discussed the desires and commitment they have to their students’ success, it’s extremely rare for high levels of respect and trust to develop.

Teachers cannot create personalized instruction or motivational environments without knowing their students. Highly effective teachers create purposeful opportunities to learn about their students and find ways to let students know they are known.Teacher and student laughing

“Kids learn based on what and how we teach, and how much we show we care for them.”
– Carla Santorno, Superintendent of Schools, Tacoma Public Schools 

David Brooks shared in the New York Times article, Students Learn From People They Love, “…what teachers really teach is themselves — their contagious passion for their subjects and students…that children learn from people they love, and that love in this context means willing the good of another, and offering active care for the whole person.”

Powerful words! They ring of “KNOWING” to me. A teacher can’t communicate “willing the good of” or “offer active care” unless she knows her students.  All teachers know some students and often unconsciously communicate the connections that enhance those students’ learning. Our consciousness needs to be focused on identifying students we don’t know, who may spend an entire day at school not being known and finding no connection. Then creating “knowing.”

I am a very strong proponent for advisories at middle and high schools to have a plan for assuring that students are known. As an advisor of maybe 20 students, hopefully for a few years, I have a responsibility to know those students and to illustrate purposefully to each student that the school responds with caring. In an earlier blog and podcast on Belonging and Relationships, I highlighted how Lake Canyon Elementary School uses a house structure to build student knowing and belonging. A video from Lake Canyon is available here.

The bottom line is this, a defining question for any school or company is:
 What is the quality of the emotional relationships here?
– David Brooks

The need for leaders to know staff and be known is reinforced in an interview, Walt Bettinger of Charles Schwab: You’ve Got to Open Up to Move Up (New York Times).

Bettinger recalls a business professor who gave him a one question final test, “What’s the name of the woman who cleans this building?” He states, “And that had a powerful impact. It was the only test I ever failed, and I got the “B” I deserved. Her name was Dottie, and I didn’t know Dottie. I’d seen her, but I’d never taken the time to ask her name. I’ve tried to know every Dottie I’ve worked with ever since. It was just a great reminder of what really matters in life, and that you should never lose sight of people who do the real work.”

Leadership, as identified by Bettinger is different from management, “With leadership, you make a decision every day about whether you choose to follow someone. And you make it in your heart, not your head.”  A great description for me of the difference between planning for teaching vs. planning for learning.

While asking and listening are critical elements of knowing, so is telling (sharing). Bettinger describes that a leader needs to be vulnerable. Sharing of failures being more important than sharing success. David Brooks raised the same point with a story that as a professor at Yale he shared with students a need to cancel his office hours due to a personal problem. That evening he received 15 email notes from students communicating that they were “thinking of him.” He felt that the relationship with that class changed for the rest of the semester from sharing that piece of vulnerability.

Where in your school or classroom leadership are you creating purposeful opportunities to know and to be known? Purposeful planning will increase the likelihood that unplanned opportunities are not overlooked.




Inquiry in Coaching

I recently had the chance to attend a workshop for parents at an international school implementing the PYP (Primary Years Program) from the International Baccalaureate Organization.  In the workshop teachers were explaining to parents the role of inquiry as the instructional strategy used when exploring the transdisciplinary themes of the program.

Parents were shown an inquiry model designed by Kath Murdock.  As I was reviewing Murdock’s phases of inquiry, it struck me that there was a parallel with the coaching process.

Murdock’s Phases of Inquiry:
Tuning in to students’ thinking-. Establishing the ‘known’, connecting to students’ lives, sense of purpose for inquiry, first thinking, first invitation for questions
Finding out-gathering information from a range of sources, working as researchers, continuing to raise questions, learning skills of investigation
Sorting out- analyzing information, looking for patterns, reviewing thinking, making meaning, expressing new understandings
Going further- personal and small group pathways of investigation, taking learning further, personalizing
Synthesizing and reflecting- reviewing earlier thinking, identifying changes in understanding, making connections between ideas, identifying what has been learned
Acting and applying- sharing new learning with others, making a difference with my learning, applying to new contexts, creating/constructing/doing
Coaching:
Pre Conference—Tuning into thinking is a great way of describing the conversation between teacher and coach. As the teacher describes a focus for the coaching, she is identifying what she knows and what she wants to find out through the coaching activity. Elements of finding out and sorting outare in the coach’s questions and the teacher’s thinking.  The teacher will want to find out and sort outduring the post conference. Sharing this thinking in the pre- conference prepares the coach and the teacher to focus on collecting the necessary information during the lesson/observation.
Observation: In many ways the coach and the teacher are research partners. An effective pre-conference focuses both and sharpens their observation skills for finding out and sorting out.
Post Conference– The post conference begins with the teacher and coach sharing their observations and continuing the finding out and sorting out, leading to a personalized meaning for the teacher (going further). This may lead to new questions turning the post conference into a pre-conference for another observation and data collection. The personalization may lead to synthesis producing an idea for change in the teacher’s practice. Acting and applying occur as the teacher maps out “what to do next”.  Planning for the coach to return and observe the changed teacher behavior in practice starts the process over.
Similar to the impact of teacher/student relationships in the classroom, as the coaching relationship extends—trust and knowing increase.  That increase in trust and knowing sets the stage for greater risk-taking in both exploration and reflection. Just as teachers learn from their students’ inquiry, coaches grow and learn from teachers’ inquiry. (A big payoff for investing time in coaching a colleague.) A teacher serving as a peer coach is in a strong learning position.