Podcast for Parents: Supporting Learners’ Curiosity

Podcast for Parents: Supporting Learners’ Curiosity

All children are naturally curious and our adult role is to provide an environment where children feel they can ask questions and get support for their explorations. Too often youngsters’ curiosity appears to not be valued as we get more focused on correct answers to questions raised by someone else.  How do we model the value and experiences of curiosity for our learners?

Watch Hal Gregersen’s You Tube Video here.
Visit Hal Gregersen’s website.
Read Fast Company’s article, “8 habits of Curious  People” here. 

Subscribe to the Steve Barkley Ponders Out Loud podcast on iTunes or visit BarkleyPD.com to find new episodes!

PODCAST TRANSCRIPT

Steve [Intro]: 00:00 Hello, and welcome to the parents as learning coaches edition of the Steve Barkley Ponders Out Loud podcast. Parents and caregivers play many different roles, at times, even somewhat conflicting roles as they support children’s development. The pandemic has shown a light on the importance of parents supporting learners. In this podcast, I’ll look to share my experiences as a teacher, educator, parent, grandparent, and continuous learner that can support your coaching efforts.

Steve: 00:33 Supporting learners’ curiosity. Curiosity is having a strong desire to learn or know something. Folks who are curious often don’t need the information that they’re inquiring about. They seek answers to their questions for the sake of gaining the knowledge. Those who are curious may also actively seek out challenges and new experiences to broaden their horizons. That sounds like something we want to be sure our children can experience. Curiosity is a key ingredient to learning. It leads to knowledge, but also to the ability to make connections among various pieces of information. Scientific research supports the notion that our brains are wired for inquisitiveness and that when we seek answers to questions that we think are interesting, we’re actually better equipped to learn and retain the information. We’re also better at remembering the other material that we uncovered while we were on our quest for the initial answers.

Steve: 01:49 There’s a reason that you don’t forget things that you’re most curious about. Curiosity actually releases dopamine in the brain, a neurotransmitter that helps improve, noticing and affects attention and remembering. When your curiosity is peaked, you’re going to remember things more deeply. As parentsm it’s less important that we have right answers and more important that we can create an environment where questioning and learning are encouraged to occur. Hal Gregerson, a senior lecturer in leadership and innovation at MIT, describes why it’s so important for kids to have adults who encourage them to question everything. Listen to what he has to say.

Hal Gregerson: 02:44 These little children grow up. They’re full of questions. No matter where I go in the world, no matter where you go in the world, they ask a thousand questions. And when they go into school systems, sometimes it disappears. But before then, they question everything. Now that’s important. If there’s one gift I could give to any child in the world is to remember that phrase, question everything. And the reason why is because when Clayton Christensen who authored, “The Innovator’s DNA,” and Jeff Dyer with me, when we interviewed people like Jeff Bezos at Amazon, the founder of Amazon or Nicholas Enstrom, who found a Skype or Pierre Omidyar, who founded eBay, all of them basically questioned the world. And this is the way in which they were able to disrupt and change the world. And interestingly, they all had some adult in their life when they were younger, who paid attention to their questions. For Jeff Bezos, it was grandparents.

Hal Gregerson: 03:40 Every summer, when he lived on their farm in Texas, he would learn how to ask the right questions to fix problems on the farm. You had Orit Gadiesh, she was the chairman or really woman, but the chairman of Bain consulting group. She had parents who valued treasured her questions and every day they were asking her about the questions she was asking. And when she was a teenager, one of her teachers wrote in her yearbook, Orit, always, always ask those two or three questions because whenever a teacher would raise their hand and say, does anybody have a question whose hand would go up? Orit’s hand would all the time go up and she’d always have two or three questions and she always asks them. And the story goes on and on and on that innovators who change the world ask questions that disrupt the world.

Steve: 04:27 There’s an issue that I continually keep coming back to in my podcast for parents and it’s a common one that I’m putting in front of teachers, and that is, we need to model what’s important. And curiosity is no different from many of the other elements we’ve looked at in podcasts. Consider how you, as a parent model curiosity. I posted a link in the lead in to this podcast from a fast company article titled, “Eight Habits of Curious People.” I’ll label the eight here and consider how you model these with your children. The authors write, “while we’re born curious, experts say that we can relearn the trait. Here are eight habits of people who’ve retained their sense of curiosity. Number one, they listen without judgment. Curious people seek to understand the perspectives of others and are willing to sit in ambiguity, open and curious without having to get invested right away in the outcome.

Steve: 05:44 Number two, they ask lots of questions. Curious people ask questions that start with how, what, and when, why and they tend to avoid questions with yes and no responses. Number three, curious people seek surprises. While too much surprise can make us anxious, without enough surprise. We have a tendency to get bored, curious people, welcome surprise in their lives. Number four, curious people are fully present. Here’s a critical one for us to be able to model for our youngsters. We can turn off the cell phone and focus on our conversations with them. Number five, curious people are willing to be wrong. Curiosity causes me to seek additional information, information that may change what I’m thinking rather than continually seeking information to reinforce what I’m thinking. Number six, a critical one for us to do with our children. Curious people make time for curiosity. Curiosity often must be instilled intentionally.

Steve: 07:04 It comes from intentional pauses. Number seven, curious people aren’t afraid to say, I don’t know. Yeah, they’re those great times where our kids can ask us questions that we don’t know the answer to and our youngsters are actually the ones that are peaking our curiosity to seek a response to that question that they posed. And lastly, number eight, curious people don’t let past hurts affect their future. Curious people develop a strong base on our more apt to take risks.” I’ve said in several podcast parenting has a strong risk taking component to it in order for us to create the opportunities that our youngsters need. I’m going to close this podcast out by jumping back to the words of Hal Gregerson. Listen in as he suggests a strategy for creating what he calls four by 24, an opportunity to look to dedicate four minutes once a day, to paying attention, to questions, your questions and the questions of others. Here’s Hal Gregerson.

Hal gregerson: 08:35 One of the greatest gifts we can give to the people around us is the space and time to ask and answer questions. And that’s part of why I’ve been working with colleagues around the world, trying to launch the 4/24 project. Here’s the deal. How could we spend four minutes, every 24 hours to either listen to questions better or to ask more questions? The other one at school is that the average student in high school at school in an average sort of classroom asks one question per month that’s content related that’s not a question like “what’s going to be on the test?” But, “why is there air?” It’s a more substantive question. Those sorts of things happen once a month. It’s like they’re question brain dead. And mostly it’s not their fault. It’s because adults aren’t listening and frankly, adults aren’t asking very good questions themselves.

Hal Gregerson: 09:33 So if I want to get out of that as a four year old or a 24 year old, or a 44 year old, or a 64 year old, or even an 84 year old, here’s my suggestion. Today, spend four minutes paying attention to the questions that matter, your own or someone else’s. Because when a four year old asks a question over and over and over again, do you know why they’re saying it and repeating the question? It’s because from their frame of mind, they don’t think you heard them. They don’t think you understood them. And as soon as they finally get it, “ah, she understands me,” they’ll stop asking the question. That’s the point. So it might be spending four minutes listening to somebody’s questions, really listening. Mark Danioff found that a company called salesforce.com. I asked mark recently, how do you figure out to ask the right question in situations? He gave me a one word answer. Listen. More than your ears, listen with your heart because when you do, you really hear, and when you hear you’ll be able to formulate the right question to unlock a solution that nobody else has for a situation. That’s the key, listening to questions and asking questions.

Steve: 10:49 Consider taking on Greg’s challenge of 4/24. I hope that I’ve sparked your curiosity with this podcast. My curiosity is what led me to produce it.

Steve [Outro]: 11:06 Thanks for listening in folks. I’d love to hear what you’re pondering. You can find me on twitter @stevebarkley or send me your questions and find my videos and blogs at barkleypd.com.




Teacher Pause and Student Thinking

The fast pace of life in and out of the classroom has ingrained in students a “quick response” goal. A sense that being the first to answer is better than the best answer. As a first-grade teacher, I often laughed when I stated to the class, ”I have a question for you to ponder” and at that point, several hands went up, ready to answer a question I had yet to ask. Observing in secondary classrooms, I have frequently shared that if you want students to think you need to keep paper and pencil out of reach. The tendency is to “get something completed” quickly, rather than engage in deeper thought. Much in our classroom environments reinforces that student conception. In most schools I’m more likely to observe a “quizlet” completion than a Socratic seminar.

One strategy for changing the environment is a teacher’s conscious practice of implementing teacher pause time with his/her questioning practices.

In 1972, Mary Budd Rowe published a paper summarizing five years of study into wait times. She observed that when teachers allowed at least 3 seconds of wait time, they involved more class members, got better quality answers and students were more likely to ask their own questions.

While certain students require differing lengths of think time and particular questions require extended time, consider a 3-3-5 format for initiating a conscious practice with teacher pause time.

 A three second pause after asking a question before calling on a student.

As the teacher finishes the question and pauses, she communicates an expectation that she wants everyone to identify an answer. Using this time to scan the class, a teacher gains information regarding student understanding and engagement.  A student may feel some pressure during the pause to consider an answer as he hasn’t been “saved” by the first hand up.

A three second pause after naming a student for the student to respond without the teacher cueing or moving onto another student. For some students putting the answer into words takes some processing time from having identified it mentally. There is also the student whose hand went up in a hurry and now needs some time to think through her response more fully.

A five second pause after a student has finished answering before providing feedback or calling on another student or moving to another question. Firstly, this allows the teacher to communicate that the student’s answer is important and she is taking time to consider it. Frequently during this pause a student may add to or change an answer now that he has heard it. (Having an auditory learning preference, I am someone who thinks while talking. As I’m speaking I hear my thoughts and decide to change what I’ve said). For many students, just the fact that the teacher paused has them change their answer because they have experienced teachers’ quick positive feedback to correct responses in the past. “If my teachers having to think about what I’ve said, it can’t be right.”

In the Journal of Teacher Education,  Mary Budd Rowe identifies benefits of implementing pause time:

  • Length of student responses increased 300%-500%
  • More inferences were supported by evidence
  • Incidences of speculative thinking increased
  • Number of questions asked and experiments proposed by students increased
  • Students to student exchanges increased
  • Failure of students to respond decreased
  • Disciplinary moves decreased as engagement increased
  • Variety of students participating voluntarily increased as did the number of unsolicited responses
  • Student confidence, as measured by fewer inflected responses, increased
  • Achievement improved on written measures of cognitive complexity

I have always been amazed at the number of benefits to students from teachers’ conscious implementation of wait time. It appears that some of these benefits may come from other changes teachers unconsciously made while practicing pausing. Mary Budd Rowe reported that:

  • Teachers’ responses to students exhibited greater flexibility with greater continuity in the development of ideas. (When teachers paused, they used the time to better unpack a student’s answer or lack of answer and decide the best next step.)
  • The number and kind of questions teachers asked changed. “There were fewer questions, but more of them entailed asking for clarification or inviting elaboration or contrary positions.” (Teachers used the time to form better questions)
  • Teacher expectations for some students seems to have increased. (This could cause many additional changes in teacher practice.) Interesting note: When teachers have higher expectations, they pause longer. Unconsciously, teachers may shorten pause time for students needing it most.

The length of time and placement of wait time is very often an unconscious teacher behavior. It’s a great area to invite a peer or instructional coach to observe and provide feedback for your reflection. Chances are good that slowing down will often take your students deeper and further. Administrators may want some coaching on staff and leadership team meetings. Would there be value in pausing for more thinking?




Questioning and Coaching

As I read the September 2015 ASCD Educational Leadership, which is focused on questioning for learning, I was struck with how many of the issues explored equally connected to coaching work with teachers.

A research alert (page 8) cites a study from the journal, Neuron (October 2014), that indicates when a person’s curiosity about a topic is piqued, it becomes easier for that person to remember information on the topic. If teachers can get students curious they can enhance students’ ability to learn the material. “How to tap students’ curiosity” in a required standard or content unit is often an element to be explore in PLCs.

If instructional coaches can tap teachers’ curiosity they will increase teachers’ investment in experimentation, learning and innovation. Just as a teacher’s goal is to generate students’ questions that foster curiosity, as coaches we need to generate teachers’ questions that foster their curiosity.

Teachers often ignite curiosity by sharing their own with their students. Coaches should do the same.

I recently had an example arise as I was conducting a post- conference with a middle school science coach who made a video of a learning activity she modeled. She developed a game that had students practicing analysis and induction thinking as they reviewed classifications. She had waited until the end of the lesson to debrief the thinking processes that the successful students were using. In the conference I “pondered out loud” about what impact doing that half way through the lesson might have. A discussion pursued regarding focusing on developing thinking processes vs specific content knowledge. Which approach would produce the content (tested) mastery with the best retention? Several action research possibilities emerged from our conference.

Questions to ask

An article by Cris Tovani, Let’s Switch Questioning Around, (page 30) examines the importance of students’ questions and questions the teacher might ask that generate students’ questions. Tovani suggests questions that don’t have one right answer and expand the way students think.

“What background knowledge do you have about the book, topic, author, or characters?”

“What are you wondering about the book, topic, author, or characters?”

“What predictions are you making?”

“What questions do you have?”

Here are some questions a coach could use to expand a teacher’s thinking:

What do you want students to gain from this work beyond what the system is testing?

As the year begins what message do you want students to get regarding your beliefs about teaching, learning, and relationships?

At what spot during the learning activity today did you see/hear what you had hoped for when planning? When did it differ from what you desired?

What questions are you currently examining about your teaching options and choices?

If you had the opportunity to change the systems’ curriculum, what change would you make? Why?

What do you want to accomplish with your students that you have not previously accomplished?

oct 4 clock

Another article in the edition, A New Rhythm For Responding, (page 46) addresses teacher wait time in questioning:

Wait Time 1: After a question is posed but before a student is called on to answer.

Wait Time 2: Directly following that student’s response.

 The authors identify that the value of teacher wait time emerged in 1969 research (Marry Budd Rowe) and has been embedded in most teacher pre-service and graduate service education but still today relatively few teachers consistently incorporate wait time in their practice.

So I guess it shouldn’t be surprising that many coaches have difficulty with wait time and pausing in their teacher conferencing. Coaches share that they are uncomfortable with silence and feel a need to have the next question ready before they have listened to a teacher’s answer.

The authors recommend a shift from the term wait time to thinking time. They suggest that three conditions need to be present for students to value and use the pause:

#1 The questions teachers ask must be worthy of thought not retrievable, memorized information.

#2 Students must know what they are supposed to do with the time allotted.

#3 Students need to know that their teacher will hold them accountable for answering.

These same three conditions are true for coaching conferences. Questions coaches raise should generate teacher reflection and creativity. Teachers should expect the coach to wait or return to an unanswered or by-passed question. I often hear coaches ask an open question and then offer choices rather than wait for the teacher to respond.

What do you think is most important? (one second pause) This or this?

Coaches have a great opportunity to model facilitation of thinking for teachers as they conference with them.

 (Educational Leadership, Questioning for Learning, September 2015, Vol. 73 No. 1 www.ascd.org)

 




Questions: the Coach’s Tool

This week, I had the opportunity to spend two days, coaching coaches. Visiting instructional coaches in Salem-Keizer Public Schools in Salem Oregon, I had the opportunity to observe instructional coaches conducting pre and post observation conferences, as well as, conduct observations of classrooms. In some cases after the observation, I role-played with the coaches how I would conduct the conference and then they conducted the actual conference with the teacher with my observation. As we debriefed, many of the coaches shared with me a renewed understanding of the importance of the questions that a coach uses.

For example, a coach who was concerned how to mention the off task student behaviors that she observed found that when she asked the teacher, “what she saw during the lesson that made her feel most comfortable and most uncomfortable”, the teacher shared the off task behaviors and opened the door for conversation. When I stopped a coach in the middle of a pre-conference after the teacher said for the second time that she wanted the lesson to go smoothly and asked “what is smoothly”, the coach gained a much clearer picture into the teacher’s agenda.

Performance Learning Systems is preparing an updated version of our three day coaches’ training (for more information email me at sbarkley@plsweb.com). It includes an extensive review of the research on coaching. What follows is the research summary of the role of questioning.

Research shows learning comes not from having experiences, but from reflecting on those experiences (Knight, 2007; Rodgers, 2002). Supportive yet challenging questions can encourage reflection (Barkley & Bianco, 2005; Gimbel, 2008). Wang and Odell (2002) suggested, “Mentors need to know how to question and help novices pose questions about prevailing practice and identify the assumptions underlying one another’s teaching” (p. 521). Dunne and Villani (2007) stressed the importance of asking questions that focus on student learning and student work and that encourage the novices reflect on their practices.

Helping professionals have long realized the potential of active listening as a crucial skill for nurturing growth and learning (Tate & Dunklee, 2005). While little research has been conducted on the use of questions in a coaching/mentoring relationship, a substantial body of knowledge concerning the use of questions in the educational process does exist (Buehler, 2005; Schroeder et al., 2007). It is likely much of this information can be extended to peer coaching situations. Udelhofen and Larson (2003) concluded dialogue and discussion are the primary tools of effective mentoring. Browne and Kelley (2007) suggested the ability to ask the right questions is a crucial to creating effective dialogue

Research shows how a question is asked influences its effectiveness (Bell & Smith, 2004; Dillon, 1997; Wang, 2006). Clarity of educators’ questions correlates positively with student achievement (Jarolimek & Foster, 2008). Bowman and McCormick (2000) found that with effective coaching, teachers could improve their level of clarity in asking questions.

Through the use of carefully framed open- and closed-ended (yes/no) questions, mentors can increase the probability of eliciting the kinds of responses desired (Dunne & Villani, 2007). Certain topics require close-ended questions to elicit factual or specific answers, while open-ended questions are more useful for encouraging evaluation and interpretation. Wang (2006) cautioned close-ended questions “…cannot be used to extend the scope of a conversation because a questioner restricts information, which is introduced” (p. 544). Listening carefully to the answers will enhance mentors’ knowledge of new teachers’needs and concerns (Dunne & Villani, 2007).

Research shows employing pauses and probes to obtain more complete answers is beneficial (Davenport, 2003). “Silence following a question can make a coach feel uncomfortable, but that may be time in which the teacher reflects” (Feger, Woleck, & Hickman, 2004, p. 16).

Research shows when questions stimulate novices’ thinking, rather than leads them to an expected answer, they are more likely to understand on a deeper level (Jarolimek & Foster, 2008; Knight,2007). Follow-up questions that refocus or redirect students’ incorrect or incomplete responses enhance student achievement (Dantonio, 1990). It is likely the same tactic aids learning in a coaching/mentoring environment.

Research shows good mentoring sessions allow novices to ask questions of the coach/mentor. This is best accomplished in an accepting and noncritical working relationship (Knight, 2007). In addition to questions that assess knowledge and understanding, other questions help coaches to explore values, promote creative thinking, and help evaluate situations (Morgan & Saxton, 1991). The most crucial point is that successful questions must be planned, not improvised (Dillon, 1997). Barkley and Bianco (2005) suggested effective listening is more than passively hearing another; active listening requires asking questions and paraphrasing the speaker’s content. As Katch (2003) suggested, asking effective open-ended questions sometimes requires teachers to give up their need to control the discussion and instead listen, for understanding. Active listening, in contrast to passive listening, involves an interactive dialogue in which the listener not only hears the speaker, but also paraphrases, summarizes, clarifies, or otherwise elaborates on the content and feelings revealed by the speaker (Ivey & Ivey, 2006).