Coaches and Principals Planning Together

“Successful coaching is the result of an interdependent relationship between the principal and the coaches,” stated Les Foltos in a Learning Forward article titled, “Principals Boost Coaching’s Impact.” The principal and coaches planning together generates the necessary support for effective, sustained coaching.

Foltos suggests exploring these areas when planning (my additional thoughts):

  • Aligning coaching with district or school goals
  • Starting with the “willing”. Success there can have a ripple effect.
  • Define roles and responsibilities. (Coach, principal, teacher leaders, all staff)
  • Measure success. (What are observable changes in teacher practice, student learning production behaviors, and learning outcomes)
  • Allocate resources, especially time. Time is essential to coaching success.
  • Establish Communication. The coaching plan should be shared with the staff. Ongoing communication among teachers, coach, and principal is necessary but cannot play a role in evaluation.
  • Engage in ongoing professional learning. Coaches (and principals) should continue sharpening their coaching skills.

Foltos cautioned that without careful planning, coaches may find they feel overworked, unfocussed, stretched too thin and ineffective.

partnership

Here is a starter list of questions that I created to address coach/principal planning with consideration to varying amounts of experience working together.  They are written allowing the coach to take the lead initially but can easily be modified for the principal to initiate.

The coach and principal are both returning, having worked together last year.

What do you identify as our greatest success last year in student learning?

What did you notice in teaching/learning observations that would have led you to predict that success?

What do you see as our focus for student growth this year?

What changes will teachers need to make to gain the student learning behaviors we need?

What would you see and hear students doing that would tell you the teacher changes are in place?

How would my work best support the changes we need?

What do you believe you will need to do?

How should we plan to communicate the plan to the staff?

The principal is returning, and coach is new to the school.

What are some of the strongest student achievement results the school is getting?

What do you believe are the staff’s efforts that are getting those results?

Where are you envisioning the next desired increase in student achievement?

What will we need to get students to do to reach that result?

What will that require teachers to do?

How should I begin my work to support those efforts?

The coach is returning, and the principal is new.

What have your experiences been coaching, being coached, and working with school-based coaches?

How does the role of a coach fit into promoting the school culture you will want to develop?

What questions do you have for me?

How can my work assist you as you begin knowing and guiding student achievement success?

The coach and principal are new to the school.

What have your experiences been coaching, being coached, and working with school-based coaches?

How does the role of a coach fit into promoting the school culture you will want to develop?

What do you know about the school that will focus our beginning work? What do we need to find out?

What are some of the initial impressions and messages you want the staff to receive?

How can I best support the start of that work?

I think summer/pre-the-start of the year is an ideal opportunity to allot the time for an in-depth planning conversations.  Principal or coach might send this blog to your partner with the invitation to schedule a meeting. I believe there is real value in knowing each other’s thinking. I’d love to hear the experiences of anyone experimenting with these questions.




Podcast for Teachers: Why Sports Are Good for Kids & What We Can Learn From Sports

Podcast for Teachers: Why Sports Are Good for Kids & What We Can Learn From Sports

Writer and cross country coach, Linda Flanagan, shares research and common sense findings about the many benefits kids can gain involvement in sports. As the author of “Take Back the Game: How Money and Mania Are Ruining Kids Sports and Why it Matters,” she also shares cautions we should be paying attention to. Consider some conversations teachers may have with students about their sports experiences.

Find Linda’s book here.

Find Linda on Twitter: @LindaFlanagan2

Subscribe to the Steve Barkley Ponders Out Loud podcast on iTunes or visit BarkleyPD.com to find new episodes!

 




Podcast: Planning for Instructional Coaching Success

Planning for Instructional Coaching Success

How are the expectations of an instructional coaching program shared with staff? This is an important question when implementing an instructional coaching program and an important element to address as new staff join a faculty each year. It also needs to be revisited when principal or coach positions change. Listen to a high school and elementary school coach and principal share their first three years of experiences as partners.

Subscribe to the Steve Barkley Ponders Out Loud podcast on iTunes or visit BarkleyPD.com to find new episodes!

PODCAST TRANSCRIPTSteve: 00:00 Hello and welcome to the Steve Barkley Ponders Out Loud podcast. Instructional coaches and leaders create the environment that supports teachers to continually imagine, grow and achieve. They model an excitement for learning that teachers in turn model for students. This podcast is dedicated to promoting the important aspects of instructional leadership. Thanks for listening.

Steve: 00:28 Planning for instructional coaching success. I’m currently supporting a district that is implementing instructional coaching for the first time. I decided to go back into my podcast interviews for voices of principals and instructional coaches whose experiences might be helpful as these leaders and coaches are beginning. In each of the interviews that follows, the coach and principal are discussing their experiences three years into their partnerships. First, we’ll hear from high school principal, Larissa McCoy and coach Robin Sullivan from the Leto High School in Tampa, Florida. I began by asking them how they communicated expectations for teachers around working with coaches.

Larissa: 01:31 So I’m glad you asked that question cause I think that changes from place to place. But at our school now, when we first came in, we really had to come in as transformational leaders which is extremely challenging because I’m sure that as you know, that takes a lot of figuring out ways to build trust with people to make sure that they were willing and able to access the health that we know that they needed. So one of the things that when we first came in is, before we even the year even started, I actually did a retreat with our coaches to help them just kind of sit them down and to say, listen, you know, this is what this is going to look like, this might be what we’re going to be up against.

Larissa: 02:08 And so let’s talk through ways right now that we can really make sure that we make people feel comfortable when we have conversations with them that might make them feel uncomfortable. So in training the coaches, we really talked a lot about student-centric coaching. So making sure that we’re not just blaming the teacher for things but instead talking about what students are doing or not doing or what those outcomes look like. So that’s kind of how we started everything. Teachers knew right away, because I am a very clear communicator, what I mean by that is, is I don’t mince words and I pretty much am a very straight shooter. So I was very, very passionate about the fact that we needed to change instructional practices at our school to best serve the students that were coming here. And I explained to them that we were going to offer different opportunities for that.

Larissa: 02:54 We created an instructional leadership team to build capacity among teachers who were here that were already doing great things with kids who then could maybe help us do great things with other teachers so they could help kids. I talked to teachers a lot about taking risks. There was a culture of fear here when we got here. And so that culture of fear, unfortunately made teachers afraid to take a risk and to try things that were new because they feared that their evaluation would somehow be negatively impacted if they did something and it failed. And so I spent a lot of the first two years here really communicating with teachers that I wanted them to use our coaches to learn how to take those risks and I wanted them to utilize those coaches for support. And well, I told them I would never impose a coach upon them because I think that nothing gets done when I’m making you do it.

Larissa: 04:23 So my staff knew that the coaches were here in a support role, that they were available anytime that they needed something, but that we weren’t psychic and so they needed to really talk to us and ask us for that support. That said, if I went into a teacher’s classroom and I realized that that teacher needed support, then I would have a coaching conversation with them and at the end of that, really to continue that cycle, I would suggest that they work with a coach and to be really honest with you, every single teacher that had that conversation with by that point was willing and able to work with the coaches. At this point, now we’re in our third year, the coaches don’t have a single day where they can do things because they’re in teacher’s classrooms, which is exactly what it’s supposed to be.

Larissa: 05:07 So my expectation in the beginning really was coaches, I want you to build trust. Teachers, I want you to take risks and together, you guys can do that. And so I want you to partner together so that we can try new things to make sure that we’re serving our students because it is unacceptable that 71% of our students are not proficient when it comes to reading and literacy.

Robin: 05:25 In the beginning, we spent a lot of time trying to build safe spaces that looked more like PD. Like we would do a learning walk and we would do many a lunch and learn type PD sessions where we could just kind of facilitate a learning environment that people had a choice to sign up for or come to. It gave them an opportunity to get to know us as coaches and get to kind of match our strengths maybe with what they needed or our personality types with what they needed because we’re all very different.

Robin: 05:57 And based on that we were able to build relationships with teachers and then they saw the usefulness and that we weren’t there to tell on them or to rat them out that we were really just helped there to help them facilitate their classrooms and to facilitate their own professional learning.

Robin: 06:15 And then based on those relationships, a lot of this job has word of mouth. So we started getting more people coming to us saying, this teacher said you did this with them and it was awesome and they love that strategy. Or, you were able to come in and just tweet one little thing in the classroom and it’s made all the difference with our kids. So we were able to sell ourselves a little bit that way in a non-threatening like non-evaluative situation, which I think has been really helpful.

Steve: 06:43 I think the process that Larissa and Robin shared is close to a suggestion that I’ve been making for starting instructional coaching programs. And that is, moving from invitational to expectational. In other words, over time, administrators’ actions and words, from hiring interviews, to problem solving conversations with individuals or teams, begins to illustrate that coaching is a way that we do business here. New teachers join the staff, where does coaching fit in? Curriculum changes occur, where does coaching fit in? Data identifies some students making insufficient progress, where does coaching fit in? A school-wide instructional model, such as PBL is adopted, where does coaching fit in? The next voices also come from Hillsborough County, Florida. Elementary principal, Glenda Vinueza and literacy coach, Heather Moncrief, share experiences from their first three years as coach and principal at Tampa Bay Boulevard School. Glenda initially encouraged Heather, who had been a resource teacher, to complete training in the district’s literacy coach program.

Glenda: 08:16 From the moment that Heather started – Heather, first of all, she’s got very strong work ethics. Let me start with that. And to be in any sort of resource or coaching position, you have to start with – you’ve got to have a strong sense of work ethics and for this, some leadership skills, which she had both. I felt that as a reading resource teacher, I thought she could do more. So I pushed her along the way and told her, why don’t you enter the cadre and see where it takes you? And four years later, you know, I will tell you, Heather is a strong advocate for kids. Among everything else, she’s a strong advocate for kids and to do what’s right for kids. She plays a huge role as the coach. First and foremost, she’s a cheerleader for students as well as for the teachers.

Glenda: 09:09 She builds a strong relationship with the teachers based on trust, which is probably the most important piece of coaching. You’ve got to have that trust not only with your administrators obviously, because they have to know that what you’re doing is the right thing, but also building that relationship with teachers that teachers feel comfortable to work with her. So our main goal is to work is to build strong teams and Heather has been, especially for the past two years, she’s been like that main leader to move our school forward as far as helping us build those collaborative teams during our lesson planning.

Steve: 09:50 Glenda, when you raise the the trust word, I know that that’s a biggie. And part of a coach’s trust with teachers is confidentiality regarding some of their work. Yet at the same time it, it’s critical for the coach and the principal to have a strong communication system between the two of them. Heather, I’m wondering if if you’d start with responding to how you handle that tug between confidentiality and a strong member of the school team. And then Glenda, please chime in and add to that.

Glenda: 10:30 Yeah. I think that I was able to build that trust with the teachers because I was already here as a resource teacher, so it was easy to kind of get into that role with them. When Glenda and I talked before I became the coach, the start of the school year, because we had planned over the summer, that was one thing we had talked about was what are we going to do when I’m working with teachers. And basically, she was very clear about not – she didn’t need to know who was doing what specifically unless it was something that was detrimental to kids. So she understood that I would be working with teachers and helping teachers, but I did not need to come report to her and tell her every single thing that was happening and going on with individual teachers. Unless it was something that it was like, okay, we need to come up with a plan to help so and so. And usually I would get the teacher on board with that to have that open communication to say, are you okay if I talked to Ms. Vinueza about this? And for the most part, I feel like most of our teachers are very much onboard with that and understanding that administrators are similar to coaches in a different way because they do observe, but they do do that evaluation part, but they help support them as an educator in their classroom.

Steve: 11:58 Heather, am I hearing in that statement that you made that the teacher’s sense in that scenario where you would, would go to Glenda,
the teacher’s sense is that you were doing that because it was important for the teacher and the kids?

Heather: 12:14 Yeah. That’s usually how I would try to word it. I would say, well, you know, we’ve tried this, we see that this, you know, like, especially like we had a lot of issues with scheduling, like scheduling is always a nightmare. So like if I’m working with a teacher during the literacy block, and then we have issues with the kids that go to speech, and let’s say, they’re getting pulled out for speech during the shared reading and that, like, it’s just juggling all of these things and I’m trying to help support the teacher and the students and the teachers really frustrated. And then I would, that’s a question that I would say, you know, we’ve tried to work it out on our own, are you okay with me going to administration to talk about, to further, you know, come up with a solution for this?

Glenda: 13:04 You know, Heather used the word detrimental. And I think that’s probably the best word that she could have used to describe when I want her to come to me. If it’s detrimental to student learning that I know something, that’s when, not just Heather, but anyone who is also part of our coaching or our resource staff, they know that’s when I really need to know. I don’t want to know about the everyday conversations or the coaching cycle. There has to be that open communication between the coaches and the teachers in order for them to really move forward and to have that continuous dialogue so that they can grow and within within that growth there’s growing pains and I don’t need to be part of that conversation. I just want to know is it detrimental to students so that I can help support that teacher because then I’ll find other ways or other tools.

Heather: 13:59 Steve, I would like to add that coaching is very accepted at our school site. Like, in the beginning, it wasn’t as much. We’ve shifted to where I’m not just coaching teachers that have problems. You know, right when I started coaching, I started coaching the – we had a teacher leader on campus and that was my first client if you will.

Steve: 14:22 Great start.

Heather: 14:23 Yeah, it was an expert. So then when people start seeing that I’m not just coaching teachers that are having low test scores or behavior problems in their class or brand new teachers, it’s a good mix of everybody. So having that atmosphere of knowing that you’re going to be coached. Whether it’s in planning or it’s in the classroom specifically for literacy or for – we have a math coach as well or math, it’s just one of those things that everybody knows is going to happen.

Steve: 15:01 I hope that what you have heard from these administrators and coaches is reinforcing for your practices and future planning as well. You might want to review their conversations with principal coach and perhaps some teacher leaders. Examine what is coaching’s current status in your school, and what progress might you want to seek. Hope you well on gaining that progress. Best wishes. Keep me posted. Thanks for listening.

Steve: 15:39 Thank you for listening. You can subscribe to Steve Barkley Ponders Out Loud on iTunes and Podbean. And please remember to rate and review us on iTunes. I also want to hear what you’re pondering. You can find me on Twitter @stevebarkley, or send me your questions and find my videos and blogs at barkleypd.com




Podcast: Promoting Coachability

In this week’s episode of the Steve Barkley Ponders Out Loud podcast, Steve ponders “Promoting Coachability”.

Listen as Steve discusses the characteristic of coachability and how to model openness to being coached.

Subscribe to the Steve Barkley Ponders Out Loud podcast on iTunes or visit BarkleyPD.com to find new episodes. Thanks for listening!

Podcast Transcript:

[00:00:00.300] – Ad

Steve Barkley Ponders Out Loud is brought to you by Academy for Educators, online professional development for teachers and leaders, online courses, modules, and microcredential programs for teachers to enhance their skillsets. Now featuring the Instructional Coaching Microcredential, including five online modules framed around the work of Steve Barkley. Learn, grow, inspire. Academyforeeducators.org.

[00:00:25.030] – Steve [Intro]

Hello and welcome to the Steve Barkley Ponders Out Loud podcast. For the last In the next 35 years, I’ve had the opportunity to learn with educators at all levels, both nationally and internationally. In each of the coming episodes, I’ll explore my thoughts and my learning on a variety of topics connected to teaching, learning, and leading. Thanks for listening in.

[00:00:49.200] – Steve

Promoting coachability. How coachable are you? As a teacher, instructional coach, or administrator, how do you model your openness to being coached? How do you model requesting feedback? And how do you model that the feedback you receive causes you to make changes. Powerful teachers impact their students when they request feedback from the students on how the teacher is doing something, how they’re organizing learning, how they’re structuring the environment of the classroom. When a teacher request that feedback from the student and then models that the teacher is making changes to, increase his or her effectiveness based on the information that they received from the students, that has a tremendous trust building component with the students.

[00:02:03.470] – Steve

And equally important, it models for the student the concept of coachability. I have frequently called this modeling of coachability, modeling the model. In other words, leaders should continually be engaged in modeling those behaviors that they’re hoping the members of the organization would carry out. In other words, if teachers watch an administrator, if students watch their teacher, are they seeing in those modeled behaviors, the behaviors that the leaders are looking for with members from the organization? As an example, when I’m training mentors who will be working with new teachers, I recommend strongly that one of the first things a mentor does is to ask the new teacher to come into the mentor’s classroom, observe, collect data, and give the feedback to the mentor. In other words, the first thing for the mentor to model is how does someone use a coach. You see, most beginning teachers have been supervised, they’ve been evaluated, but they probably haven’t experienced being mentored or coached. And so when the mentor is able to model for the beginning teacher, here’s how you use a mentor, here’s how you use a coach. So the mentor goes to the beginning teacher and ask the beginning teacher to come to their classroom, observe something specific, perhaps the way the mentor responds to student questions, or perhaps collecting the kinds of student conversations that are occurring in cooperative teams.

[00:04:22.780] – Steve

And then in a post-conference setting, the mentee now gives that feedback to the mentor, and the mentor models that openness to receiving the feedback, the way to think about and consider the feedback, the way to perhaps question in order to get greater detail from the mentee’s observation. These are all behaviors that you would be looking for the mentee to now exhibit when the the mentor first goes into the mentee’s classrooms. I’m real big on pushing that model out there. Before the mentor goes in to be observing in the mentee’s classroom, you create that opportunity for the mentee to observe in the mentors classroom. A high coachability is certainly a characteristic we would want to develop among our students. If students are approaching learning with a growth mindset, then they would be more interested in their teacher’s feedback, being able to create a continuous improvement or growth within the student rather than looking for the teacher’s feedback as being a evaluation that states the goal has been met. I think it’s interesting that most students would expect their music teacher to continually improve their performance based on the feedback they received. They would expect their athletic coach to cause continuous improvement by the feedback they received.

[00:06:34.760] – Steve

Yet I believe we’ve created a structure in many of our classrooms where students are more anxious for their teacher’s feedback to say the goal has been met rather than the teacher’s feedback providing coaching information that would lead to improvement. I recall a great example of a language arts teacher I worked with at the high school level, and she had her students do a rather lengthy piece of writing, probably around October, November in the school year. And sometime later, the students got the writing back from her with comments on things that were strong and ways that it could be improved. And over some time frame, the students redid the piece, worked on those improvements, and received it back. Again, no grade, comments on what was strong and how they could improve it. And this activity went back and forth probably four or five times. Sometime late in the school year, the student received their writing back with a grade. If the grade was an A, which it was for many of the students by that time, the teacher not only put on the grade of A, but she identified for them when they had reached an A level.

[00:08:32.460] – Steve

Many of the students got the feedback that they had reached an A level back in January or February and had now improved the piece two or three times after having received an A. And many of the students went to the teacher in protest. And when they protested, she smiled and said, “Thank you. That’s exactly the feedback I need, I needed you to know that that’s exactly why I conducted this activity, because I wanted you not to be stopped by any teacher who gave you a grade of A, knowing that you probably got the A prior to having reached the best that you can do.” And that ongoing growth was, to this teacher a much more important message for the students to gain than was receiving their grade of A. In many ways, the same problem of evaluation versus coaching exists in our schools for teachers. A study released out of Brown University titled, “The Effect of Teacher Coaching on Instruction and Achievement,” explored the problem we have in scaling up coaching within our schools. I think that it’s connected to this concept of coachability. Let me quote from the article: “No matter the expertise or enthusiasm of a coach, coaching is unlikely to impact instructional practice if teachers themselves are not invested in or are uncomfortable with the coaching process.

[00:10:39.290] – Steve

Coaching requires teachers to be willing to open themselves to critique and recognize personal weaknesses. This openness on the part of teachers is facilitated both by the school culture committed to continuous improvement and by strong relational trust among administrators and staff members. Teachers that perceive the observation and feedback cycles associated with teacher coaching as a process intended to document shortcomings towards efforts to exit teachers may be unwilling to acknowledge a coach’s critiques or experiment with new behaviors for fear that it may be used against them. This suggests that building environments where providing and receiving constructive feedback is a regular part of teachers’ professional work may be a key condition for success of upscale efforts.” It is clear to me that trust is critical to having this culture that promotes coachability. But I find the trust issue almost a chicken and egg argument. I have people who say to me, well, we can’t have peer coaching in our school because we don’t have that trusting environment. My sense is, until you start peer coaching, you aren’t going to get that trusting environment. In other words, I’m pretty sure that the trust is built by people engaging and experiencing in that coaching setting, recognizing the payoff that come from any risks that they take.

[00:12:39.680] – Steve

I’ve had these thoughts about how we could go about creating that coaching culture, or as I would, guess, I’d like to describe it as the coachability within educators. Imagine that we started right at the beginning in teacher education classes at the university. Could you imagine a setting where students enroll in an education course where they’re going to begin the initial practice and skill development of some teaching skills, that all of that was carried out in a coaching environment where students were frequently experiencing receiving coaching from their classmates as they to develop their skillset. And then imagine that in an undergraduate class – students had professors coming into their classrooms, observing and coaching the professors who were teaching the undergraduate class and perhaps doing that live in front of the students so that in these earliest stages of becoming an educator, people had the chance to see the impact of coaching. And then student teaching. Wouldn’t it make sense that student teachers went out in groups of two or three and established a coaching relationship among each other as they are working in a given school. Then that as a student teacher, they experienced their cooperating teacher receiving coaching feedback from an instructional coach in the building or from peers as a colleague.

[00:14:45.700] – Steve

And then within the school, how do we communicate these models of openness and coachability? How frequently are teachers being able to observe their administrator, if not being coached publicly, at least talking about how they are changing practice based on what they’re learning from their coaching experiences? When does a principal have that opportunity to know about the coaching that the superintendent is currently seeking and how a superintendent in a school district is making changes based upon the learning that’s coming from the coaching that he or she is receiving? Being highly coachable means being a great listener. It means listening to information, feedback, data from anyone, willing to learn from anyone, willing to consider all advice, even advice that we might eventually discard for its possibilities. Early in my presenting and consulting career, I learned the joy and sometimes the pain of reading evaluations of my work several times a week. When I’d read through a stack of 100 participants’ comments, there were maybe 75% excellent and 25% good and five terrible. As I begin to read those, I would wonder what problem the 5% of the people had that prevented them from getting the value out of the work that I had done.

[00:16:48.940] – Steve

As my confidence grew in my own abilities, I learned that those negative evaluations frequently contained some seed of an opportunity for my improvement. The negative comments might explain what caused some of the participants who rated the session as good instead of excellent, more than I could gain from reading the comments from people who had rated the work as good. High coaching Coachability leads to our opportunity for continuous growth. As you consider how coachable you are and the ways that you want to model coachability. Consider these comments from Timothy Clarke, Coachability is not just teachability. It’s not just a willingness to learn. It’s a willingness to unlearn and change. Coachability is a moral capacity that allows a person to accept feedback, acknowledge faults, limitations, and deficiencies, and to act on that new information. Have a coachable day. Thanks for listening.

[00:18:28.080] – Steve [Outro]

Thanks for listening, folks. I’d love to hear what you’re pondering. You can find me on Twitter at Steve Barkley, or send me your questions and find my videos and blogs at barkleypd.com.




Podcast: Everyone Deserves a Coach

In this week’s episode of the Steve Barkley Ponders Out Loud podcast, Steve ponders “Everyone Deserves a Coach.”

Listen as Steve ponders how we should have models that cause everyone working in a building to have feedback at least once per week, as well as the idea that the more highly skilled and professional an individual becomes, the more coaching they should receive.

Subscribe to the Steve Barkley Ponders Out Loud podcast on iTunes or visit BarkleyPD.com to find new episodes. Thanks for listening!




Podcast: Instructional Coach & Principal as Partners

In this week’s episode of the Steve Barkley Ponders Out Loud podcast, Steve ponders “Instructional Coach & Principal as Partners.”  

Listen as Steve examines the importance of building a strong instructional coach/principal partnership in order to increase student achievement.

Subscribe to the Steve Barkley Ponders Out Loud podcast on iTunes or visit BarkleyPD.com to find new episodes.  Thanks for listening!